← All templates

Performance Review Template and Rubric

A clean annual performance review template with a 5-point rubric, goal scoring, development plan and calibration-ready output — customise and roll out in a week.

Why this matters

Most Pakistani employers conduct annual reviews that amount to a subjective rating and an increment. That produces inconsistent outcomes, low trust, and frequent disputes during termination. A proper template forces the manager to evaluate against pre-agreed goals, justify the rating with evidence, and propose a development plan — which also strengthens the employer's position in any future misconduct or non-performance proceeding.

Download template

Get a properly formatted Microsoft Word (.docx) file with headings, bullets and placeholders already styled. Replace all [SQUARE BRACKETS] with your own details.

Download .docx
Prefer to copy-paste? Expand to view the raw text
ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REVIEW

Review period: ____________________ to ____________________

1. EMPLOYEE DETAILS
Name:           ____________________________________
Employee ID:    ____________________________________
Department:     ____________________________________
Designation:    ____________________________________
Reporting Manager: _________________________________
Reviewer (if different): ___________________________

2. GOALS FROM LAST CYCLE (OUTCOMES)

  Goal 1: ________________________________________
  Weight (%): ____
  Evidence / result: _____________________________
  Self rating (1–5): __   Manager rating (1–5): __

  Goal 2: ________________________________________
  Weight (%): ____
  Evidence / result: _____________________________
  Self rating (1–5): __   Manager rating (1–5): __

  Goal 3: ________________________________________
  Weight (%): ____
  Evidence / result: _____________________________
  Self rating (1–5): __   Manager rating (1–5): __

  Goal 4: ________________________________________
  Weight (%): ____
  Evidence / result: _____________________________
  Self rating (1–5): __   Manager rating (1–5): __

  TOTAL WEIGHT: 100%

3. COMPETENCY RATINGS (1–5)
- Job knowledge and technical skill:     __
- Quality of work and attention to detail: __
- Ownership and accountability:          __
- Collaboration and communication:       __
- Adaptability and learning:             __

4. RATING SCALE
  5 — Exceeds expectations consistently; a role model
  4 — Regularly exceeds expectations
  3 — Meets expectations; solid contributor
  2 — Partially meets; needs improvement in specific areas
  1 — Does not meet expectations; formal improvement plan needed

5. OVERALL RATING
Overall rating (1–5): ____
Justification (2-3 sentences with evidence):
_____________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________

6. STRENGTHS TO LEVERAGE
_____________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________

7. AREAS FOR DEVELOPMENT
_____________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________

8. GOALS FOR NEXT CYCLE
  1. ________________________________________  Weight: __
  2. ________________________________________  Weight: __
  3. ________________________________________  Weight: __
  4. ________________________________________  Weight: __

9. DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Training / coaching / stretch projects:
_____________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________

10. EMPLOYEE COMMENTS
_____________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________

11. SIGNATURES
Employee signature: ____________________  Date: ________
Manager signature:  ____________________  Date: ________
HR signature:       ____________________  Date: ________

How to use this template

  • Calibrate ratings across the department before finalising — otherwise you'll end up with 80% of employees rated 4 or 5
  • Tie the overall rating to the increment band transparently — share the band structure with employees in advance
  • For underperformance, follow the rating with a formal Performance Improvement Plan (PIP) — rating alone isn't enough
  • Keep the signed form in the employee file for a minimum of 3 years
  • If you already use Peoplifi, use the built-in review workflow so ratings feed compensation automatically
  • Do mid-year check-ins too — annual-only reviews produce recency bias

FAQs

How often should performance reviews happen?

Annual with a mid-year check-in is the standard for Pakistani employers. Technology and high-growth companies increasingly run quarterly lightweight reviews.

Is a low rating enough to terminate an employee?

No. Termination for non-performance requires a documented improvement plan, reasonable time to improve, and adherence to the Standing Orders Ordinance process — rating alone will be struck down.

Should self-assessment be mandatory?

Yes — it surfaces disagreement early and forces a conversation instead of a one-way verdict.

Stop printing templates

Peoplifi generates Pakistan-compliant offer letters, warning letters and policy packs from your employee data in one click — no copy-pasting, no version drift.

Start Free Trial →Browse all templates